Back to Career Hub
ATS Tool Comparison: What Actually Matters for Getting Interviews
Many resume tools look impressive, but not all of them produce resumes that parse cleanly in Applicant Tracking Systems. Use this checklist to compare tools based on ATS outcomes, not aesthetics.
Feature Comparison: ATS Compatibility and Practical Output
| Feature | Smart ATS Resume | Typical Resume Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Parsing-safe layout | Single-column, ATS-friendly structure by default. | May use columns/icons that reduce readability. |
| Keyword alignment | Helps you identify missing keywords from the job post. | May rely on generic suggestions instead of job-specific gaps. |
| Bullet point strength | Encourages metrics and strong action verbs. | Often focuses on tone/grammar over impact and specificity. |
| Export reliability | Exports that preserve text and structure. | Some exports introduce layout artifacts that hurt parsing. |
The Verdict
If your priority is getting hired, choose a tool that prioritizes ATS readability: standard headings, single-column layout, and job-specific keyword coverage.